cd16 microbeads magnetic cell sorting kit Search Results


95
Miltenyi Biotec cd16 microbeads
Cd16 Microbeads, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd16+microbeads+magnetic+cell+sorting+kit/CD16+MicroBeads%2C+human/pmc01574117-101-4-8
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd16 microbeads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
STEMCELL Technologies Inc magnetic cd16 microbeads
Magnetic Cd16 Microbeads, supplied by STEMCELL Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd16+microbeads+magnetic+cell+sorting+kit/rosettesep+cocktail/us09464035-252-21-24
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
magnetic cd16 microbeads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson anti-cd16 magnetic microbeads
Anti Cd16 Magnetic Microbeads, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd16+microbeads+magnetic+cell+sorting+kit/anti+cd56/pmc02765678-52-14-27
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-cd16 magnetic microbeads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Miltenyi Biotec cell sorting
Cell Sorting, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd16+microbeads+magnetic+cell+sorting+kit/CD14+MicroBeads%2C+human+-+lyophilized/pm25918390-138-8-15
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cell sorting - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Miltenyi Biotec primate anti cd16 microbeads
Primate Anti Cd16 Microbeads, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd16+microbeads+magnetic+cell+sorting+kit/CD16+MicroBeads%2C+non-human+primate/pmc05056160-83-6-9
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
primate anti cd16 microbeads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

98
Miltenyi Biotec cd14 microbeads
Cd14 Microbeads, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd16+microbeads+magnetic+cell+sorting+kit/CD14+MicroBeads%2C+human/pmc06200588-146-9-13
Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd14 microbeads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
98/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Miltenyi Biotec magnetic streptavidin microbeads
Magnetic Streptavidin Microbeads, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd16+microbeads+magnetic+cell+sorting+kit/Streptavidin+MicroBeads/pmc06514449-85-13-28
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
magnetic streptavidin microbeads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Miltenyi Biotec magnetic straightfrom whole blood cd14 microbeads
Magnetic Straightfrom Whole Blood Cd14 Microbeads, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd16+microbeads+magnetic+cell+sorting+kit/StraightFrom+Whole+Blood+CD14+MicroBeads%2C+human/pmc07279522-294-16-23
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
magnetic straightfrom whole blood cd14 microbeads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
STEMCELL Technologies Inc microbeads coated with abs to cd14, cd16, cd19, cd56, and glycophorin a
Microbeads Coated With Abs To Cd14, Cd16, Cd19, Cd56, And Glycophorin A, supplied by STEMCELL Technologies Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd16+microbeads+magnetic+cell+sorting+kit/mouse+cd11c+positive+selection+kit/pm17475896-61-16-29
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microbeads coated with abs to cd14, cd16, cd19, cd56, and glycophorin a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Miltenyi Biotec cd4 microbeads
Percentages of regulatory T cells (Tregs), pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory T cell subsets after co‐culture with ECP‐treated monocytes of healthy donors. (a) In‐vitro ECP‐treated or untreated monocytes of healthy donors were co‐cultured with autologous <t>CD4+</t> T cells with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) at a monocyte : T cell ratio of 1 : 4 for 5 days. Induction of CD3+CD4+CD25+forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)+ Tregs (n = 8), proinflammatory CD3+CD4+interferon (IFN)‐γ+ T helper type 1 (Th1) cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+interleukin (IL)‐17A+ Th17 cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+IL‐17A+IFN‐γ+ Th17/Th1 cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+IL‐2+ T cells (n = 19) and anti‐inflammatory CD3+CD4+IL4+ Th2 cells (n = 18) was assessed by intracellular flow cytometry analysis. (b–f) Necessity of cell‐contact or cytokine environment for changes in T cell subsets was analysed by incubation of ECP untreated or treated monocytes for 24 h and subsequent addition of either monocytes and 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody (cell‐contact) or supernatant of monocytes, 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody and 1 μg/ml anti‐CD28 antibody (supernatant) to CD4+ T cells (n = 7 or n = 5). Co‐cultures were investigated after 5 days. ECP untreated or treated monocytes directly co‐cultured with anti‐CD3 antibody and CD4+ T cells were used as reference (reference). ****P < 0·0001, **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.
Cd4 Microbeads, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd16+microbeads+magnetic+cell+sorting+kit/CD4+MicroBeads%2C+rat/pmc06378377-64-18-31
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd4 microbeads - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson phycoerythrin (pe)–conjugated cd158b mab
Percentages of regulatory T cells (Tregs), pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory T cell subsets after co‐culture with ECP‐treated monocytes of healthy donors. (a) In‐vitro ECP‐treated or untreated monocytes of healthy donors were co‐cultured with autologous <t>CD4+</t> T cells with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) at a monocyte : T cell ratio of 1 : 4 for 5 days. Induction of CD3+CD4+CD25+forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)+ Tregs (n = 8), proinflammatory CD3+CD4+interferon (IFN)‐γ+ T helper type 1 (Th1) cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+interleukin (IL)‐17A+ Th17 cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+IL‐17A+IFN‐γ+ Th17/Th1 cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+IL‐2+ T cells (n = 19) and anti‐inflammatory CD3+CD4+IL4+ Th2 cells (n = 18) was assessed by intracellular flow cytometry analysis. (b–f) Necessity of cell‐contact or cytokine environment for changes in T cell subsets was analysed by incubation of ECP untreated or treated monocytes for 24 h and subsequent addition of either monocytes and 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody (cell‐contact) or supernatant of monocytes, 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody and 1 μg/ml anti‐CD28 antibody (supernatant) to CD4+ T cells (n = 7 or n = 5). Co‐cultures were investigated after 5 days. ECP untreated or treated monocytes directly co‐cultured with anti‐CD3 antibody and CD4+ T cells were used as reference (reference). ****P < 0·0001, **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.
Phycoerythrin (Pe)–Conjugated Cd158b Mab, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd16+microbeads+magnetic+cell+sorting+kit/anti+cd158b/pmc02765678-52-23-27
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
phycoerythrin (pe)–conjugated cd158b mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

97
Miltenyi Biotec macs human cd34 microbead kit
Percentages of regulatory T cells (Tregs), pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory T cell subsets after co‐culture with ECP‐treated monocytes of healthy donors. (a) In‐vitro ECP‐treated or untreated monocytes of healthy donors were co‐cultured with autologous <t>CD4+</t> T cells with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) at a monocyte : T cell ratio of 1 : 4 for 5 days. Induction of CD3+CD4+CD25+forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)+ Tregs (n = 8), proinflammatory CD3+CD4+interferon (IFN)‐γ+ T helper type 1 (Th1) cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+interleukin (IL)‐17A+ Th17 cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+IL‐17A+IFN‐γ+ Th17/Th1 cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+IL‐2+ T cells (n = 19) and anti‐inflammatory CD3+CD4+IL4+ Th2 cells (n = 18) was assessed by intracellular flow cytometry analysis. (b–f) Necessity of cell‐contact or cytokine environment for changes in T cell subsets was analysed by incubation of ECP untreated or treated monocytes for 24 h and subsequent addition of either monocytes and 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody (cell‐contact) or supernatant of monocytes, 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody and 1 μg/ml anti‐CD28 antibody (supernatant) to CD4+ T cells (n = 7 or n = 5). Co‐cultures were investigated after 5 days. ECP untreated or treated monocytes directly co‐cultured with anti‐CD3 antibody and CD4+ T cells were used as reference (reference). ****P < 0·0001, **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.
Macs Human Cd34 Microbead Kit, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/cd16+microbeads+magnetic+cell+sorting+kit/CD34+MicroBead+Kit%2C+human/pmc04456213-35-66-71
Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
macs human cd34 microbead kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
97/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Percentages of regulatory T cells (Tregs), pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory T cell subsets after co‐culture with ECP‐treated monocytes of healthy donors. (a) In‐vitro ECP‐treated or untreated monocytes of healthy donors were co‐cultured with autologous CD4+ T cells with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) at a monocyte : T cell ratio of 1 : 4 for 5 days. Induction of CD3+CD4+CD25+forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)+ Tregs (n = 8), proinflammatory CD3+CD4+interferon (IFN)‐γ+ T helper type 1 (Th1) cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+interleukin (IL)‐17A+ Th17 cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+IL‐17A+IFN‐γ+ Th17/Th1 cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+IL‐2+ T cells (n = 19) and anti‐inflammatory CD3+CD4+IL4+ Th2 cells (n = 18) was assessed by intracellular flow cytometry analysis. (b–f) Necessity of cell‐contact or cytokine environment for changes in T cell subsets was analysed by incubation of ECP untreated or treated monocytes for 24 h and subsequent addition of either monocytes and 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody (cell‐contact) or supernatant of monocytes, 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody and 1 μg/ml anti‐CD28 antibody (supernatant) to CD4+ T cells (n = 7 or n = 5). Co‐cultures were investigated after 5 days. ECP untreated or treated monocytes directly co‐cultured with anti‐CD3 antibody and CD4+ T cells were used as reference (reference). ****P < 0·0001, **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.

Journal: Clinical and Experimental Immunology

Article Title: Monocytes show immunoregulatory capacity on CD4 + T cells in a human in‐vitro model of extracorporeal photopheresis

doi: 10.1111/cei.13232

Figure Lengend Snippet: Percentages of regulatory T cells (Tregs), pro‐ and anti‐inflammatory T cell subsets after co‐culture with ECP‐treated monocytes of healthy donors. (a) In‐vitro ECP‐treated or untreated monocytes of healthy donors were co‐cultured with autologous CD4+ T cells with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) at a monocyte : T cell ratio of 1 : 4 for 5 days. Induction of CD3+CD4+CD25+forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)+ Tregs (n = 8), proinflammatory CD3+CD4+interferon (IFN)‐γ+ T helper type 1 (Th1) cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+interleukin (IL)‐17A+ Th17 cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+IL‐17A+IFN‐γ+ Th17/Th1 cells (n = 27), CD3+CD4+IL‐2+ T cells (n = 19) and anti‐inflammatory CD3+CD4+IL4+ Th2 cells (n = 18) was assessed by intracellular flow cytometry analysis. (b–f) Necessity of cell‐contact or cytokine environment for changes in T cell subsets was analysed by incubation of ECP untreated or treated monocytes for 24 h and subsequent addition of either monocytes and 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody (cell‐contact) or supernatant of monocytes, 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody and 1 μg/ml anti‐CD28 antibody (supernatant) to CD4+ T cells (n = 7 or n = 5). Co‐cultures were investigated after 5 days. ECP untreated or treated monocytes directly co‐cultured with anti‐CD3 antibody and CD4+ T cells were used as reference (reference). ****P < 0·0001, **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.

Article Snippet: CD4 + T cells and CD14 + CD16 + monocytes were isolated by magnetic cell isolation (MACS) using CD4 microbeads and the Pan Monocyte Isolation Kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany).

Techniques: Co-Culture Assay, In Vitro, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Incubation

Influence of in‐vitro ECP‐treated monocytes on autologous T cell proliferation. ECP untreated or treated monocytes were co‐cultured with CD4+ T cells from the same donor with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) for 5 days after in‐vitro ECP. (a,b) Proliferation rates of CFSE‐labelled CD3+CD4+ T cells were assessed via flow cytometry (histogram shows one donor of 31, n = 31). (c) Necessity of cell‐contact or cytokine environment for changes in proliferation was analysed (n = 4). Therefore, ECP untreated or treated monocytes were cultured for 24 h exclusively. In cell‐contact‐dependent approaches freshly isolated CD4+ T cells were cultured with precultured monocytes at a monocyte : T cell ratio of 1 : 4 in the presence of 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody for 5 days (cell‐contact). For cytokine‐mediated approaches supernatant of precultured monocytes were added to freshly isolated CD4+ T cells with 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody and 1 μg/ml anti‐CD28 antibody (supernatant). Approaches where ECP untreated or treated monocytes were directly co‐cultured with 100 ng/ml soluble anti‐CD3 antibody and CD4+ T cells were used as reference (reference). Co‐cultures were investigated after 5 days. ****P < 0·0001, **P < 0·01.

Journal: Clinical and Experimental Immunology

Article Title: Monocytes show immunoregulatory capacity on CD4 + T cells in a human in‐vitro model of extracorporeal photopheresis

doi: 10.1111/cei.13232

Figure Lengend Snippet: Influence of in‐vitro ECP‐treated monocytes on autologous T cell proliferation. ECP untreated or treated monocytes were co‐cultured with CD4+ T cells from the same donor with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) for 5 days after in‐vitro ECP. (a,b) Proliferation rates of CFSE‐labelled CD3+CD4+ T cells were assessed via flow cytometry (histogram shows one donor of 31, n = 31). (c) Necessity of cell‐contact or cytokine environment for changes in proliferation was analysed (n = 4). Therefore, ECP untreated or treated monocytes were cultured for 24 h exclusively. In cell‐contact‐dependent approaches freshly isolated CD4+ T cells were cultured with precultured monocytes at a monocyte : T cell ratio of 1 : 4 in the presence of 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody for 5 days (cell‐contact). For cytokine‐mediated approaches supernatant of precultured monocytes were added to freshly isolated CD4+ T cells with 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody and 1 μg/ml anti‐CD28 antibody (supernatant). Approaches where ECP untreated or treated monocytes were directly co‐cultured with 100 ng/ml soluble anti‐CD3 antibody and CD4+ T cells were used as reference (reference). Co‐cultures were investigated after 5 days. ****P < 0·0001, **P < 0·01.

Article Snippet: CD4 + T cells and CD14 + CD16 + monocytes were isolated by magnetic cell isolation (MACS) using CD4 microbeads and the Pan Monocyte Isolation Kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany).

Techniques: In Vitro, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Isolation

Comparison of T cell subsets and proliferation rates after ex‐vivo and in‐vitro ECP of patient samples. The samples were collected from the apheresis bag during ECP procedure before addition of UVADEX® (ECP–, ex vivo) and after ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation (ECP+, ex vivo). Monocytes from patients were isolated, co‐cultured with freshly isolated CD4+ T cells from healthy donors at a monocyte : T cell ratio of 1 : 4 with 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody and analysed 5 days after ECP. Furthermore, monocytes from patient samples before addition of UVADEX® were isolated and treated with the ECP in‐vitro model (ECP– and ECP+, in vitro). Afterwards, monocytes were co‐cultured with CD4+ T cells from healthy donors and anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) and investigated after 5 days. Induction of CD3+CD4+CD25+forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) (n = 4*), proinflammatory CD3+CD4+interferon (IFN)‐γ+ T helper type 1 (Th1) cells (n = 6*), CD3+CD4+interleukin (IL)‐17A+ Th17 cells (n = 6*), CD3+CD4+IL‐17A+IFN‐γ+ Th17/Th1 cells (n = 6*), CD3+CD4+IL‐2+ T cells (n = 5*) and anti‐inflammatory CD3+CD4+IL4+ Th2 cells (n = 5*) in approaches with (a) ex‐vivo‐ and (b) in‐vitro‐treated monocytes was assessed by intracellular flow cytometry analysis. (c) Determination of T cell proliferation rates after co‐culture with ex‐vivo‐ and in‐vitro‐treated monocytes via CFSE labelling and flow cytometry analysis (n = 3). *One of 4 or 6 data points after ex‐vivo ECP treatment is missing due to coagulation of sample material. **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.

Journal: Clinical and Experimental Immunology

Article Title: Monocytes show immunoregulatory capacity on CD4 + T cells in a human in‐vitro model of extracorporeal photopheresis

doi: 10.1111/cei.13232

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparison of T cell subsets and proliferation rates after ex‐vivo and in‐vitro ECP of patient samples. The samples were collected from the apheresis bag during ECP procedure before addition of UVADEX® (ECP–, ex vivo) and after ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation (ECP+, ex vivo). Monocytes from patients were isolated, co‐cultured with freshly isolated CD4+ T cells from healthy donors at a monocyte : T cell ratio of 1 : 4 with 100 ng/ml anti‐CD3 antibody and analysed 5 days after ECP. Furthermore, monocytes from patient samples before addition of UVADEX® were isolated and treated with the ECP in‐vitro model (ECP– and ECP+, in vitro). Afterwards, monocytes were co‐cultured with CD4+ T cells from healthy donors and anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) and investigated after 5 days. Induction of CD3+CD4+CD25+forkhead box protein 3 (FoxP3)+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) (n = 4*), proinflammatory CD3+CD4+interferon (IFN)‐γ+ T helper type 1 (Th1) cells (n = 6*), CD3+CD4+interleukin (IL)‐17A+ Th17 cells (n = 6*), CD3+CD4+IL‐17A+IFN‐γ+ Th17/Th1 cells (n = 6*), CD3+CD4+IL‐2+ T cells (n = 5*) and anti‐inflammatory CD3+CD4+IL4+ Th2 cells (n = 5*) in approaches with (a) ex‐vivo‐ and (b) in‐vitro‐treated monocytes was assessed by intracellular flow cytometry analysis. (c) Determination of T cell proliferation rates after co‐culture with ex‐vivo‐ and in‐vitro‐treated monocytes via CFSE labelling and flow cytometry analysis (n = 3). *One of 4 or 6 data points after ex‐vivo ECP treatment is missing due to coagulation of sample material. **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.

Article Snippet: CD4 + T cells and CD14 + CD16 + monocytes were isolated by magnetic cell isolation (MACS) using CD4 microbeads and the Pan Monocyte Isolation Kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany).

Techniques: Comparison, Ex Vivo, In Vitro, Irradiation, Isolation, Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, Co-Culture Assay, Coagulation

Characterization of in‐vitro ECP‐treated monocytes. ECP untreated or treated monocytes were cultured after in‐vitro ECP for 2 days and (a) absolute cell counts referred to originally seeded cell numbers directly after ECP treatment (day 0) were determined (n = 9). (b) Determination of proportions of living, early apoptotic, late apoptotic and dead cells was performed by calcium‐dependent staining of ECP untreated or treated monocytes with annexin V after 2 days and successive flow cytometry analysis (n = 6). (c) Moreover, ECP untreated or treated monocytes were co‐cultured with CFSE‐labelled CD4+ T cells from the same donor in different monocyte : T cell ratios with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) for 5 days after in‐vitro ECP and proliferation rates of CD3+CD4+ T cells were assessed via flow cytometry (n = 3–5). Induced percentages of (d) CD14+CD209‐human leucocyte antigen D‐related (HLA‐DR)+CD86+ monocytes and (e) CD14+CD209+HLA‐DR+CD86+ macrophages (n = 15) as well as (f) HLA‐DR‐CD33+CD14+monocytic myeloid derived suppressor cells (M‐MDSCs) (n = 16) were assessed via flow cytometry analysis 2 days after in‐vitro ECP. ****P < 0·0001, **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.

Journal: Clinical and Experimental Immunology

Article Title: Monocytes show immunoregulatory capacity on CD4 + T cells in a human in‐vitro model of extracorporeal photopheresis

doi: 10.1111/cei.13232

Figure Lengend Snippet: Characterization of in‐vitro ECP‐treated monocytes. ECP untreated or treated monocytes were cultured after in‐vitro ECP for 2 days and (a) absolute cell counts referred to originally seeded cell numbers directly after ECP treatment (day 0) were determined (n = 9). (b) Determination of proportions of living, early apoptotic, late apoptotic and dead cells was performed by calcium‐dependent staining of ECP untreated or treated monocytes with annexin V after 2 days and successive flow cytometry analysis (n = 6). (c) Moreover, ECP untreated or treated monocytes were co‐cultured with CFSE‐labelled CD4+ T cells from the same donor in different monocyte : T cell ratios with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) for 5 days after in‐vitro ECP and proliferation rates of CD3+CD4+ T cells were assessed via flow cytometry (n = 3–5). Induced percentages of (d) CD14+CD209‐human leucocyte antigen D‐related (HLA‐DR)+CD86+ monocytes and (e) CD14+CD209+HLA‐DR+CD86+ macrophages (n = 15) as well as (f) HLA‐DR‐CD33+CD14+monocytic myeloid derived suppressor cells (M‐MDSCs) (n = 16) were assessed via flow cytometry analysis 2 days after in‐vitro ECP. ****P < 0·0001, **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.

Article Snippet: CD4 + T cells and CD14 + CD16 + monocytes were isolated by magnetic cell isolation (MACS) using CD4 microbeads and the Pan Monocyte Isolation Kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany).

Techniques: In Vitro, Cell Culture, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Derivative Assay

Investigation of the connection between programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) and PD‐L2 and T cell proliferation. ECP untreated or treated monocytes were cultured for 2 days and proportions of living (a) CD14+PD‐L1+ and (b) CD14+PD‐L2+ monocytes were determined via flow cytometry. Furthermore, ECP untreated or treated monocytes were co‐cultured with CD4+ T cells from the same donor with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) for 5 days after in‐vitro ECP and proportions of living (c) CD3+CD4+PD‐L1+ and (d) CD3+CD4+PD‐2+ monocytes were determined via flow cytometry. (e) To block PD‐L1‐PD‐1 and PD‐L2‐PD‐1 interactions 25 µg/ml of pembrolizumab, anti‐PD‐L1 or anti‐PD‐L2 antibody was added to co‐cultures of either untreated or ECP‐treated monocytes with CFSE‐labelled CD4+ T cells from the same donor with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) stimulation for 5 days after in‐vitro ECP. Proliferation rates of CD3+CD4+ T cells were assessed via flow cytometry. **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.

Journal: Clinical and Experimental Immunology

Article Title: Monocytes show immunoregulatory capacity on CD4 + T cells in a human in‐vitro model of extracorporeal photopheresis

doi: 10.1111/cei.13232

Figure Lengend Snippet: Investigation of the connection between programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD‐L1) and PD‐L2 and T cell proliferation. ECP untreated or treated monocytes were cultured for 2 days and proportions of living (a) CD14+PD‐L1+ and (b) CD14+PD‐L2+ monocytes were determined via flow cytometry. Furthermore, ECP untreated or treated monocytes were co‐cultured with CD4+ T cells from the same donor with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) for 5 days after in‐vitro ECP and proportions of living (c) CD3+CD4+PD‐L1+ and (d) CD3+CD4+PD‐2+ monocytes were determined via flow cytometry. (e) To block PD‐L1‐PD‐1 and PD‐L2‐PD‐1 interactions 25 µg/ml of pembrolizumab, anti‐PD‐L1 or anti‐PD‐L2 antibody was added to co‐cultures of either untreated or ECP‐treated monocytes with CFSE‐labelled CD4+ T cells from the same donor with anti‐CD3 antibody (100 ng/ml) stimulation for 5 days after in‐vitro ECP. Proliferation rates of CD3+CD4+ T cells were assessed via flow cytometry. **P < 0·01, *P < 0·05.

Article Snippet: CD4 + T cells and CD14 + CD16 + monocytes were isolated by magnetic cell isolation (MACS) using CD4 microbeads and the Pan Monocyte Isolation Kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany).

Techniques: Cell Culture, Flow Cytometry, In Vitro, Blocking Assay